Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Davis v. Tarrant County Mental Health Mental Retardation
as 4:2012cv00187
Plaintiff: Otis Lee Davis
Defendant: Tarrant County Mental Health Mental Retardation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Scott et al
as 4:2012cv00013
Plaintiff: Otis Lee Davis
Defendant: Wayne Scott, Lt Saw, Sergent Names Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03402
Petitioner: Willie Otis Harris, Jr
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02532
Plaintiff: Otis S. Bowman
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00456
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abramov v. Otis Elevator Co et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00440
Plaintiff: Gena M. Abramov
Defendant: Otis Elevator Company and Desert Palace Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02126
Petitioner: Otis D. Johnson
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01060
Petitioner: Willie Otis Harris, Jr
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00143
Petitioner: Otis Champ Allen
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. ISF Facility
as 5:2008mc00008
Petitioner: Otis Champ Allen
Respondent: ISF Facility

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?