Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Lee v. Sooter et al
as 2:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Wendell Alan Lee
Defendant:
Kelly J Sooter, Seth G Klein, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulsen v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01592
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Seth Paulsen
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Level 3 Communications, LLC et al v. Chenault
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC and Broadwing Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Seth Ramsey Chenault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Jury
as 4:2014mc00015
Defendant:
Robert Kelley Aussicker, Trina Renee Chamberlain, Seth Andrew Czikowsky and others
The New Testament Church of Christ Inc et al v. Collins et al
as 3:2014cv02197
Plaintiff:
Elbert Moore
Defendant:
John Willie Collins, Superior Dynamics Inc, Sunnyvale Limited Partnership Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Evans v. Livingston et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
B Livingston, Barry L Martin, James Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Phommahaxay et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
M L Phommahaxay, Brad Livingston, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes v. Harris et al
as 6:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Evan Seth Estes
Defendant:
Jay Harris, Tom Green County Jail, Matthew Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv02484
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Defendant:
Chris LeBlanc, David LeBlanc, Doctors Hospital of Shreveport 401(k) Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harris v. Spruce Printing Company 401(k) Plan
as 4:2013cv00481
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Defendant:
Spruce Printing Company 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
