Cases 51 - 60 of 431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rogers v. Abbott et al
as 5:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Defendant:
Governor Mr. Grey Abbott, Mr. Michael Bell, Ms. Marsha McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Moore
as 3:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Charlie Ray Bell
Respondent:
Rocky Moore and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. State of Texas
as 4:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Ted Bell
Respondent:
Texas and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SOS Trucking et al v. AmeriHome Mortgage Company, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv03140
Plaintiff:
SOS Trucking and The Estate of Andrea Bell
Defendant:
AmeriHome Mortgage Company, LLC, Cenlar FSB and Everett Financial Inc doing business as Supreme Lending
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. TDCJ-CID
as 3:2021cv03151
Petitioner:
Darrell Bell
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Bell et al
as 3:2021cv03051
Plaintiff:
Lee Hamilton
Defendant:
FNU Bell, FNU Mosley, FNU Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macaskill v. Bell Textron, Inc.
as 4:2021cv01284
Defendant:
Bell Textron, Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Bell Textron Canada LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Ann Macaskill, Josef Stoxreiter and Arthur Channon
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Candice Leigh Stoxreiter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jimenez v. Bell et al
as 5:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
Salvador Jimenez
Defendant:
Michael Bell, Bill Gates, NFN NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
