Cases 1 - 10 of 3,204
Grant v. Binkley
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Thomas Grant
Defendant:
Ryan Binkley
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Gerald Wilson Thomas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brooks v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 3:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brooks
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
BMW Bank of North America v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
BMW Bank of North America
Defendant:
Bryant Thomas
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Thomas v. USA
as 4:2024cv00435
Petitioner:
Wilkinson Oloyede Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Byers v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Jodie Louis Byers
Defendant:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Phil Sorrels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
