Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Zirus v. Cozby
as 1:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Scott Ash James Zirus
Respondent:
Jennifer Cozby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abraham v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Ash Abraham
Defendant:
Fredrickus Watson and Royal Trucking Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. McKesson Corporation
as 3:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson, John Stricklin, Ashely McKinney and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mendez et al v. Ash Grove Cement Company
as 3:2017cv02424
Plaintiff:
Julian Mendez and Ricardo Cisneros
Defendant:
Ash Grove Cement Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tangelo IP LLC v. Sam Ash Music Corporation
as 3:2017cv02104
Plaintiff:
Tangelo IP LLC
Defendant:
Sam Ash Music Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Architecttura Inc v. Mission Village of Pecos LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02793
Plaintiff:
Architecttura Inc
Defendant:
Mission Village of Pecos LLC, Mission Village of Pecos MM LLC, Louie Lange III and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Narayan et al
as 3:2016cv01417
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ash Narayan , The Ticket Reserve Inc, Richard M Harmon and others
Receiver:
Michael Napoli
Movant:
RGT Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Golden Cheek Ventures, LP vs. Brazos Electric Power
as 4:2015cv00821
Plaintiff:
Golden Cheek Ventures, LP
Defendant:
Brazos Electric Power Cooperative Inc , U.S. Department of Interior , Sally Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Zirus v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00014
Petitioner:
Scott Ash James Zirus
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
