Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Castro v. Trump et al
as 4:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Charles Rettig, Maria Chapa Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randle et al v. The PNC Financial Services Group et al
as 4:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Brianna Randle and Sywayne Burgess
Defendant:
The PNC Financial Services Group, PNC Bank, Cindy Avina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center et al
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
George Stewart
Defendant:
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lori Rice-Spearman, Steven Lee Berk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Espinoza v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Jose Villalon Espinoza
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Espinoza v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
Jose Alejandro Villalon Espinoza
Respondent:
Rachal Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arnoldo v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Curiel Trevino Luis Arnoldo and Luis Arnoldo Curiel Trevino
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jallow v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
Salifu Jallow
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Edson Santiesteban Garcia
Respondent:
Rachal Chapa and Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fawehinmi v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Pelumi Folarin Fawehinmi
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Navarro-Escobedo v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Navarro-Escobedo
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
