Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Freeman v. USA
as 2:2024cv00154
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Xavier Andrew Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, FNU Saunders, FNU Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Lamont Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Baik et al
as 3:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Brandon West, Justin Baik, Kathleen Freeman and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com Inc and Amazon Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp, AT&T Services Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc, AT&T Corp, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Freeman v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Eric Freeman
Defendant:
United States, United States Postal Service and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
