Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Santoyo et al
as 3:2022cv01911
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Guillermo Santoyo, Jr, Joel Gonzalez, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Code Enforcement Business et al
as 3:2022cv01907
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Code Enforcement Business, Stacey Graves, The MacFarlane Firm PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gorman et al
as 3:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Esther Gorman, Gene Gorman, Code Enforcement Cedar Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Vincent's Roofing, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00873
Defendant:
Vincent's Roofing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. USA
as 3:2016cv02076
Petitioner:
Michael Charles Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. West Texas I.S.F. et al
as 5:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael T Jones
Defendant:
West Texas I.S.F., S Payne, Texas Department Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02228
Plaintiff:
Michael E Jones
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Depuy and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
