Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski, Andrew March, Nicholas Nelli and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Webster et al v. Opco LLC
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Rachel Webster, Skylor Dobbs and C.D.
Defendant:
Blue Box Opco LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rand et al v. Eyemart Express LLC
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Rand, Esperanza Gottschau and Ramon Soto
Defendant:
Eyemart Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Orejudos et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Rachel Lee Orejudos and Jean Felix
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Collier v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Rachel Collier
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gordon v. Kellam
as 3:2023cv02088
Plaintiff:
Daryl Jerome Gordon
Defendant:
Rachel Joyce Kellam, Attorney General of Texas Child Support Division, Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jackson et al v. Beswick et al
as 3:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson and Chapter Jackson
Defendant:
Jordan Beswick and Rachel Gossett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Butler v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Tasha Barnett, Rachel M Anderson and Bryan L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ancrum v. Lyft Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Mattie Rachelle Ancrum
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. d/b/a Lyft Drives Texas, Inc., Lyft Center, Inc., Dartanyan Jamerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
