Cases 1 - 10 of 66
White v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacob White
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Innovative Sports Management Inc v. Penrhyn LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Inc as Broadcast Licensee of the (i) March 29, 2022 Peru v. Paraguay Soccer Match; (ii) March 29, 2022 Colombia v. Venezuela Soccer Match; and (iii) March 29, 2022 Chile v. Uruguay Soccer Match doing business as Integrate
Defendant:
Penrhyn, LLC doing business as The Londoner doing business as The Londoner Pub, Rosemarie Tate doing business as The Londoner doing business as The Londoner Pub and Penrhyn LLC doing business as The Londoner doing business as The Londoner Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Innovative Sports Management,Inc v. Londoner Group LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management,Inc as Broadcast Licensee of the: (i) March 29, 2022 Peru v. Paraguay Soccer Match; (ii) March 29, 2022 Ecuador v. Argentina Soccer Match; and (iii) March 29, Colombia v. Venezuela Soccer Match doing business as Integrate
Defendant:
Londoner Group LLC individually doing business as The Londoner Pub and Grill and Berry Tate individually doing business as The Londoner Pub and Grill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chery Penner et al v. Gaines County, Texas et al
as 5:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Chery Penner and Megan Tate Gandy
Defendant:
Gaines County, Texas, Jeffery James, Calvin Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tate v. Kroger Texas LP
as 3:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Charles Tate
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00382
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Prado Tefel v. Tate et al
as 3:2021cv03225
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Jacob Prado Tefel
Respondent:
NFN Tate and Dennis Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
