Cases 101 - 110 of 234
Gonzales v. Nueces County, Texas et al
as 2:2016cv00153
Plaintiff:
Danny Gonzales
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, Justin Noland, Deputy Perales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medina v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Norma Linda Leal Medina
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Medina v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2016cv01168
Plaintiff:
Norma Linda Leal Medina
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Arenas et al v. Sandford Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ashland Arenas , Jason Villareal , Cedric Camp and others
Defendant:
Sandford Oil Company, Inc., Sandford Oil South Texas, Inc., Western Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson Rico v. Medina et al
as 4:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Luis Johnson Rico
Defendant:
Martha Medina, Leon Rodriguez, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayco Farms, Inc. v. McAllen Produce, LLC et al
as 7:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Ayco Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
McAllen Produce, LLC , PJJJ Trust , Lori J. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Hernandez-Medina v. Miss Winnie, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Hernandez-Medina
Defendant:
Miss Winnie, Inc. and Edward Garcia, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Medina-Gonzales v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2015cv00497
Petitioner:
Jose Medina-Gonzales
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Medina-Gonzales v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2015cv00452
Petitioner:
Jose Medina-Gonzales
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Charlot v L D Smith, et al
as 4:2015cv03028
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Charlot
Defendant:
City Of Houston , L D Smith, Sergeant Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
