Cases 21 - 30 of 185
Martinez v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
George Martinez
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, Well Path, L.L.C., Fernando Carreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Village Bank & Trust, N.A. v. Fountain of Tooth Family Dentistry, PLLC et al
as 4:2021cv00326
Defendant:
Peggy Burns a/k/a Peggy Burns-Toole, Fountain of Tooth Family Dentistry, PLLC, Peggy Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Village Bank & Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. Vertafore, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04139
Defendant:
Vertafore, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derek Allen, John Burns and Leandre Bishop
Keyhan et al v. Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv04132
Defendant:
Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC, PV Holding Corp., Burns & McDonnell, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Amir Keyhan and Reshad Keyhan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackburn et al v. American Zurich Insurance Company
as 4:2019cv04814
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Burns and Robert Blackburn
Defendant:
American Zurich Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starkey v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv04055
Plaintiff:
Brock Andrew Starkey
Defendant:
Dr Lannette Linthicum, John Doe, Seung Taek Lim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. City of Santa Fe, Texas et al
as 4:2019cv03878
Plaintiff:
Damon Burns
Defendant:
James Weiland Sergeant and City of Santa Fe, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2019cv00329
Defendant:
Sergeant James Weiland and City of Santa Fe, Texas
Plaintiff:
Damon Burns and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Burns v. City of Santa Fe, Texas et al
as 3:2019cv00338
Plaintiff:
Damon Burns
Defendant:
James Weiland Sergeant and City of Santa Fe, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
