Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Stone v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stone et al v. Estelle Senior Warden et al
as 4:2020cv01468
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fisher, Lord Osby and Frederick Stone
Defendant:
Estelle Senior Warden, Lorie Davis and Estelle Assistant Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penigar v. Glassel et al
as 4:2019cv04191
Defendant:
Lt. Stone, Cpt. Mohammed Touhami, RN Boyce and others
Plaintiff:
Pieron D. Penigar and Kieron Derek Penigar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Semco Maritime, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02006
Defendant:
Semco Maritime, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Stone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Ogg et al
as 4:2019cv00895
Defendant:
Judge Michael McSpadden, Ed Gonzalez, Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Oggs et al
as 4:2019cv00894
Defendant:
Kim Oggs, Ed Gonzalez, Mike Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Harley Marine Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00413
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Stone
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Harley Marine Gulf, LLC, City of Houston, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Stevens et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2018cv00456
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Frakes, Michael S. Stone, Kent Larry Bakken and others
Respondent:
William H. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stone v. Illinois National Insurance Co.
as 6:2018cv00109
Defendant:
ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE and Illinois National Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
RANDALL STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
