Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Houston v. Plant Supervisor Fredicks et al
as 4:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Shift Supervisor Jones, Shift Supervisor Winfrey, Plant Supervisor Fredicks and others
Plaintiff:
Reddie Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteing v. Miles et al
as 4:2020cv03210
Defendant:
Ms. Miles, Ms. Hudson, Ms. Corione and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Whiteing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Montemayor et al
as 4:2020cv01362
Defendant:
Asst Supervisor H Booker, Report Supervisor K. Lopez and Plant Supervisor M. Montemayor
Plaintiff:
Fernando L Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bible- Marshall et al v. Montgomery County et al
as 4:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
LUCKY STAR JOSEPHINE BIBLE, FRANCINE BIBLE-MARSHALL and Francine Bible- Marshall
Defendant:
WELLPATH, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, CONROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2019cv03775
Defendant:
Unit Classification Committee Members, Counsel substitute Tubbs, J. Looney and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callis v. Hoke et al
as 2:2018cv00284
Defendant:
(Coach) Supervisor Candice Moore and Administrator Frank Hoke
Plaintiff:
Reginald Andre Callis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv02989
Defendant:
Wardens, J. B. Conally Unit, Lorie Davis, All DOLCO (Even) Ranking Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Weylin W. Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Demel et al
as 4:2018cv02909
Defendant:
Supervisor Fernandez and P Demel
Plaintiff:
Maron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Demel et al
as 4:2018mc02282
Plaintiff:
Maron Smith
Defendant:
P Demel and Supervisor Fernandez
Lara v. Harris County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv03783
Plaintiff:
Eric Lara, Sr
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office, 6th Floor Supervisor, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
