Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Lott v. White et al
as 4:2019cv00137
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Joni White
Petitioner:
Rheashad Lamar Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Starstone National Insurance Company et al
as 6:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Seth Lamar Tubre and Starstone National Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Justin Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamar v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2018cv03859
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bryan Lamar
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00319
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lamar Texas Limited Partnership, L.P. v. City of Portland, Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00310
Defendant:
The Board of Adjustment for the City of Portland, Brian DeLatte, P.E. and City of Portland, Texas
Plaintiff:
Lamar Texas Limited Partnership, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Adams et al
as 1:2018mc00469
Defendant:
Madison Timber Properties, LLC and Arthur Lamar Adams
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Miller v. Kelley et al
as 4:2017cv03026
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lamar Miller
Defendant:
Michael Kelley, Penny Goodie, Prairie View City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRISTOW FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 4:2017mc01240
Plaintiff:
BRISTOW FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD , MARK EVANS , CHRISTINA J. EVANS and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c. , Marathon Petroleum Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation and others
Lugo-Gonzalez v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Blanca Lugo-Gonzalez
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc. and Cecil Lamar Derico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. Harris County Municipal Corp
as 4:2017mc00526
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamar Livingston Bey
Defendant:
Harris County Municipal Corp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
