Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Manuel v. The State Of Texas
as 4:2018cv02434
Plaintiff:
Eddie - Tyrone: Manuel
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Judge Angela Elisabeth Ellis, Lori Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kio v. Family Law Center et al
as 4:2018cv01287
Plaintiff:
Julian Kio
Defendant:
Family Law Center, Texas Human Health Services , Marquesha Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmidt v. Villareal et al
as 7:2017mc01821
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Schmidt
Defendant:
Marta Villareal , Idolina Rivera , Mario Alberto Zuniga and others
Intervenor:
Myra Lynn Martinez and Lisa Garza
Pierre v. Oginni et al
as 3:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
Andre Pierre
Defendant:
Adenike Oginni, Smith, Edgar Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case name not on file
as 7:2017cv00264
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00254
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Clayton v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2017cv00882
Plaintiff:
Natalie S. Clayton
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lazo et al v. M&G Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Sergio Lazo , Robert Mejia , Ricky Lee Vasquez and others
Defendant:
M&G Corporation, Integrity Mechanical Specialists, LLC, Richard Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gruber v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
Russell Gruber
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Natalie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. TGS-Nopec Geophysical Co.
as 3:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Natalie Robertson
Defendant:
TGS-Nopec Geophysical Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
