Cases 31 - 40 of 165
Pugh-Powell et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
as 4:2020cv03314
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Kathy Pugh-Powell, L. P., Laquita Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. Oyeluyi et al
as 2:2020cv00206
Petitioner:
Stephan Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis, Adaway, Ms. Nutty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Black v. Powell et al
as 4:2020cv01985
Defendant:
George Powell and Dennis K Powell
Plaintiff:
J B Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Richards et al
as 3:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Lisa M Percival, FSM IV Valerie P Myrick, Toby L Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Barron et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mitchell
Defendant:
Lonnie Townsend, Uche N. Wali, James B. Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baloney et al vs. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC
as 4:2019cv05029
Plaintiff:
Dwight Richardson, Tommy Merchant, Vernetta Shelvin and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A), Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livingston v. Harris County Sheriff Office Jail et al
as 4:2019cv04891
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff Office Jail, Judge George Powell, Jason Ryan Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Lameikia Sharona Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. MetLife Insurance et al
as 4:2019cv04082
Defendant:
Judge George Powell, David Ryan Michael & Associates, The State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Lameika Sharona Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herod v. Powell et al
as 2:2019cv00271
Defendant:
D. Powell and M Mills
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Herod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Powell
as 7:2019cv00323
Plaintiff:
Adriana Garza
Defendant:
John Bernard Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
