Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04364
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aduna v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jorge Aduna
Defendant:
Jefferson Sessions, Attorney General of the United States and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Santana v. Attorney General of the United States of America
as 4:2014mc02998
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States of America
Petitioner:
Manuel Santana
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IFONE NEDA Internet Service, Inc. v. Army & Airforce Exchange Service et al
as 4:2013cv00703
Plaintiff:
IFONE NEDA Internet Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Army & Airforce Exchange Service , Department Of The Army , US Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03028
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00937
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Pointer v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 4:2010cv04884
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wayne Pointer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Attorney General Of The United States and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Pointer v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2010mc00491
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wayne Pointer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Attorney General Of The United States and United States Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
