Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Thompson v Baldwin et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin and Lipan Street A1 Bail Bond Driver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Hill et al
as 4:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Ricky Orlando Garcia and Orlando Abad Lopez
Defendant:
Chris Hill, Conroe Police Department and Another Chance Bail Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Nemeic et al
as 4:2021cv02753
Plaintiff:
Erik Ivan Rivera
Defendant:
Mark Nemeic, Jason Carl Pennington, Alfred Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. A-Mobile Bail Bonds et al
as 4:2021cv02584
Plaintiff:
Erik Ivan Rivera
Defendant:
A-Mobile Bail Bonds, Gary Neal Higgins, Mark Nemeic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Huggins et al
as 4:2021cv02607
Plaintiff:
Erik Ivan Rivera
Defendant:
Gary Neal Huggins, Mark Nemeic, Alfredo Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Huggins et al
as 4:2021cv02417
Defendant:
Douglass Paul Clark, Gary Neal Huggins, Mark Nemeic and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Ivan Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Calcasieu Parish, LA et al
as 3:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jesse Thomas Brown
Defendant:
Calcasieu Parish, LA and Fuselier Bail Bonding Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castenada Bail Bonds v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company
as 7:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Castenada Bail Bonds
Defendant:
Axis Surplus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Livingston v. MetLife Insurance et al
as 4:2019cv04082
Defendant:
Judge George Powell, David Ryan Michael & Associates, The State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Lameika Sharona Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobson v. ABC Bail Bonds Co.
as 4:2017cv02449
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jacobson
Defendant:
ABC Bail Bonds Co.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
