Cases 11 - 20 of 992
Lee et al v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Flynn Lee, Rochion Gregg and Andrea Jordan
Defendant:
City of Austin and Carol Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Ford
as 6:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Sydney Zuiker, Nate Spinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Henson et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Monica Johnson, Me'Kia Mouling, Clifford Jones and others
Defendant:
Darryl Henson, Marlin Independent School District and John Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heghmann v. Biden et al
as 6:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Heghmann
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Micah Cheatham, Jack Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King et al v. ECLERX, LLC
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Taakque D. King and Adriene F. Johnson
Defendant:
ECLERX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
May v. Bell et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Alonzo May
Defendant:
Michael Bell, Carol Savage, Jennifer Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sheriff, Wayne Dicky
as 5:2023cv01530
Petitioner:
Earnest Key Johnson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
