Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Webster v. Sam's West, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00156
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Sam's West, Inc. and Sam's East, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webster and Carl R. Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Escandon v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00386
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOE ESCANDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mendez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Phillips v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
Louis B. Phillips
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Herrera v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00477
Plaintiff:
Zaira Herrera
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gee v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
Eric A Gee
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
