Cases 21 - 30 of 79
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALBAGMI et al
as 4:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Faheed Albagmi, David Knox, Alvin Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Beltran v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2018cv00305
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons, Mr. Avila, Warden Scott Nicklin and others
Plaintiff:
George A. Beltran
Hinds v. Barnes et al
as 1:2018cv00558
Defendant:
Jess Ramos, Matt Barnes, Jason Bobo and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Elmer Hinds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00190
Plaintiff:
Virginia Avila, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Avila, Jr.
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Avila-Jaimes v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
Oscar Armando Avila-Jaimes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Avila v. USA
as 2:2017cv00069
Petitioner:
Mario Avila
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2017cv00967
Defendant:
Officer FNU Avila, Medical Supervisor Katheryn Gieger, Officer E. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcez, et al v. Nextstep Development, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Imelda Avila and Rachel Gomez Garcez
Defendant:
Nextstep Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Amsler et al v. FT Fitness OPCO, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01121
Plaintiff:
David Amsler, Roberto Avila, Jose Benitez and others
Defendant:
FT Fitness OPCO, LLC, TXFF1 LLC, TXFF2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Avila v. USA
as 2:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Mario Avila
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
