Cases 1 - 10 of 867
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Douglas Ray Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mora et al v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Dalia Mora, Ashley Rodriguez and Genevie Garzes
Defendant:
Joseph Hernandez and Bobby A Santo-Domingo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Debnam v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Kevin Debnam
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Brandon Luis Marshall
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Mills et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Daniel Mills, Judge Tracie Wright-Reneau, Prosecutor Jennifer Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00418
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
