Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Holland v. CryptoZoo, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Don Holland
Defendant:
CryptoZoo, Inc., Logan Paul, Danielle Strobel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Webster v. Kijakazi et al
as 6:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Webster, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Whitney Thorp, Czarnowski Display Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Webster v. Giddings et al
as 6:2022cv00882
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Webster, Jr.
Defendant:
Karen Giddings, Czarnowski Display Service, Inc., Trumbull Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
BARNETT v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO et al
as 5:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
SEAN BARNETT
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO, SHWETA BANSAL and STEPHANIE LEVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beltran v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Shivon Beltran
Defendant:
City of Austin, John Doe, Nikolas Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bravo et al v. Pelosi et al
as 6:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bravo, P. P., Lindsey Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Mike Podhorzer, Pete Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
281) 358-1076 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00371
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguero v. Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Francisco J. Aguero, Sr.
Defendant:
Bryan Christopher Banks, CCL #1, CCL #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
