Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Heimer v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 5:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
Len Heimer
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Scott v. Upton County Appraisal District et al
as 5:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Len Scott
Defendant:
Upton County Appraisal District, Upton County Chief Appraiser, Upton County Appraisal Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vajdos v. Custer III et al
as 5:2021cv01265
Plaintiff:
John Vajdos
Defendant:
Len Elwood Custer III and Custer Resources and Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
v. NASC Inc.
as 7:2021cv00090
Defendant:
NASC Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pro Lens Projects LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00211
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
David Len Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Len White v. Lorie Davis
as 5:2020cv00540
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Robert Len White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Visionworks of America, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
as 1:2017mc00055
In Re:
Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Respondent:
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Movant:
Visionsworks of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Doe v. The City of San Antonio, et al
as 5:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
William McManus, Officer, Jackie "Jack" Len Neal and The City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Allen
as 1:2010cv00651
Petitioner:
Guy Len Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. United States Of America
as 6:2009cv00036
Petitioner:
Ray Len Brooks
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
