Cases 11 - 20 of 1,221
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Moore, Hirst, Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Stoy et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Stoy, Williams, Officer Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Accomack County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Greer, Donnie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Keith McDonald
Defendant:
Mr. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binns v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Defendant:
SGT. Coles, LT. Riggsby, K9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Shawn P. Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
