Cases 101 - 110 of 68,817
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Mason v. USA
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Hugh Ellis Mason, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Nealy v. Warden of MCTC et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Michael Nealy
Respondent:
Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battifora Gonzales et al v. Cleaning Services of Virginia And Maryland, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Fiorella Battifora Gonzales and Norma Carolina Montalvan Cruz
Defendant:
Cleaning Services of Virginia And Maryland, LLC and Ervin Macak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Scopata v. A & L RV Sales LLC
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Mark Scopata
Defendant:
A & L RV Sales LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tichaona v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Munyaradzi Tichaona
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Park v. Shin et al
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Seungho Park
Defendant:
Ellie Ilyoung Shin, THE QUI GAINESVILLE, LLC, THE QUI GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baker v. USA
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
Andre Maurice Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Mickduff and Mark Andersham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
