Cases 131 - 140 of 69,141
Reilly v. Suitebriar, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bevan Reilly
Defendant:
Suitebriar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ali v. Schweiner et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Kazim Ali
Defendant:
Carl Schweiner, Carrie Poulin, Robert Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Goodman v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Goodman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Khamari Hunter
Defendant:
Trisha Brown, Gabe Morgan and Garrett Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Allen et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
George Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Robin Allen and Dr. Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archer v. Citizens and Farmers Bank
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Patricia Archer
Defendant:
Citizens and Farmers Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Pool Scouts Franchising, LLC v. Stuart Road Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Counter Defendant:
Pool Scouts Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Stuart Road Corporation and Brent Berridge
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831 Defense of Trade Secrets Act (DTSA)
Wenger, M.D. v. Mobius Mobility, LLC
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mark Wenger, M.D.
Defendant:
Mobius Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
DeiuLio v. Baydu
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Adam M. DeiuLio
Defendant:
Dr. Baydu and Dr. Haydu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chesapeake Bank v. Jones, et al.
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Stella Gale Jones, Perfect Touch Innovations, LLC and Valley Communities Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
