Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Morrison v. The Rivers Bend Shopping Center, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00443
Plaintiff:
Patricia Morrison
Defendant:
The Rivers Bend Shopping Center, LLC , Rivers Bend Shopping Center II, LLC , Emerson Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spell v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jeremy T. Spell
Defendant:
B. W. Jones and B. Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalili v. The Rector and Visitors of George Mason University et al
as 1:2011cv00400
Plaintiff:
Wazhma Khalili
Defendant:
The Rector and Visitors of George Mason University, Alan G. Merten, A. Lee Fritschler and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Go v. USA
as 1:2009cv00191
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Emerson Reyes Go
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gray v. Emerson et al
as 4:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Gray
Defendant:
William Emerson, Quicken Loans, Inc., Janice K. Huey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gray v. Emerson et al
as 4:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Gray
Defendant:
William Emerson, Quicken Loans, Inc., Janice K. Huey and others
Intervenor:
Gary-Mario Gray
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lamb v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert Emerson Lamb
Defendant:
Commissioner, Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lamb v. Astrue, Commssioner of Social Security
as 4:2007cv00021
Plaintiff:
Robert Emerson Lamb
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lamb v. Astrue, etc., et al
as 4:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert Emerson Lamb
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Manager Michael Cummings and Case Worker Rosana Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Lamb v. Astrue, etc.
as 4:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert Emerson Lamb
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
