Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, II
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services and Wake County N.C., family Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Wake County Guardian Ad Litem Program, Wake County Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 4:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, The State of North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Wake County Goerment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wake County Human Services of Raleigh North Carolina et al
as 4:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Wake County Human Services of Raleigh North Carolina, Eric Craig Chasse, Monica M. Bousman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Davis v. Town of Cary North Carolina et al
as 4:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Cary North Carolina, Harold Weinbrecht, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanders v. State of North Carolina
as 2:2008cv00042
Petitioner:
Warren Rayvon Sanders
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
