Cases 21 - 30 of 31
IN RE STAR SCIENTIFIC, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2013cv00550
Plaintiff:
William Skillman
Defendant:
Jonnie R. Williams, Paul L. Perito, Christopher Chapman and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
David C. Inloes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Haynes v. U-Haul et al
as 1:2012cv01038
Plaintiff:
Suprener Haynes
Defendant:
U-Haul , U-Haul International, Inc. , U-Haul Company of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Haynes v. USA
as 2:2012cv00158
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lino H. Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Haynes et al
as 1:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ivan E. Davis
Defendant:
Haynes, Smith, Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv09801
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Haynes
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes Furniture Company, Incorporated v. Scherer
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Haynes Furniture Company, Incorporated
Defendant:
Edward L. Scherer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khalili v. The Rector and Visitors of George Mason University et al
as 1:2011cv00400
Plaintiff:
Wazhma Khalili
Defendant:
The Rector and Visitors of George Mason University, Alan G. Merten, A. Lee Fritschler and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Jones v. Target Store, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Jones
Defendant:
Target Store, Inc., Target Store, Inc., Susan Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Butler v. Higgs, et al.
as 1:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Terrance Butler
Defendant:
Joseph Higgs, Shallenburger, Day and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
