Cases 31 - 40 of 56
The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2014cv01302
Plaintiff:
The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company
Defendant:
Thomas K. Armstrong and Armstrong Arboriculture, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Etterson v. Boakye et al
as 3:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Etterson
Defendant:
E. Boakye, Jeffery Newcome, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Henrico County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00883
Plaintiff:
Kayla Camille Armstrong
Defendant:
Michael Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al v. FNF Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00750
Plaintiff:
Kelly Perry , Leonard L. Armstrong, III and John Daniels
Defendant:
FNF Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Ripley et al v. J. Henry Holland Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Bernard W. Ripley and Deborah H. Ripley
Defendant:
J. Henry Holland Corporation , Waco, Inc. , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. Y & Won, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Arlene Armstrong
Defendant:
Y & Won, Inc., Yong Sook Chang and Suk Hoon Chang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong v. USA
as 1:2013cv00589
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffery K. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Thomas Armstrong, Shirley Armstrong, Yvonne Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
