Cases 41 - 50 of 460
Trotman v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Deputy McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, Jane Murphy, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, The General Insurance Company, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employee Benefits
Clemens v. Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01444
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Clemens
Defendant:
Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc., John Doe 1-5 and Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lane v. Smallwood
as 3:2022cv00739
Defendant:
Smallwood and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Darrick L. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Civil Rights Education Amendments Act 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank & The General Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00907
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank & The General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
