Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Thomas v. Catapult Technology, Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv01343
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Thomas
Defendant:
Catapult Technology, Ltd., Pentagon Protection Force Agency and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaudhry v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
as 1:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
Amit Chaudhry
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage , Aurora Loan Servicing , Glasser & Glasser, P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patient First Corporation v. HF Acquisition Co., LLC, et al
as 3:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Patient First Corporation
Defendant:
HF Acquisition Co., LLC, and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Walsh v. One West Bank, FSB et al
as 1:2013cv01094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Walsh
Defendant:
One West Bank, FSB and John Does 1-10/Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prison Legal News v. Stolle et al
as 2:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Defendant:
Ken Stolle and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raub v. Bowen et al
as 3:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Brandon Raub
Defendant:
Daniel Lee Bowen , Russell Morgan Granderson , John Does 1 - 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation-False Arrest
Moore v. Kuplinski et al
as 3:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Moore
Defendant:
John R. Kuplinski, John Doe 1-10, Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bowden v. John Doe Number 1 et al
as 2:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bowden
Defendant:
John Doe Number 1, John Doe Number 2, John Doe Number 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fegely v. One West Bank FSB et al
as 3:2012cv00592
Plaintiff:
Margaret Fegely
Defendant:
One West Bank FSB, Indymac Mortgage Servicer, Home Loan Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
