Cases 41 - 50 of 138
Murphy v. Andrews
as 2:2019cv00683
Respondent:
Warden J. Andrews
Petitioner:
Patrick Cokay Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baisden, Michelle et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02970
Defendant:
Capital One N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One Bank (USA)
Plaintiff:
Scott Rossi, Patricia Murphy, Natalie Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Murphy v. Andrews
as 1:2019cv01183
Petitioner:
Troy Lamont Murphy
Respondent:
J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 1:2019cv00943
Respondent:
M. D. Summers, Harold Clarke, Israel Hamilton and others
Petitioner:
Andy L. Ralston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Murphy et al
as 2:2019cv00354
Defendant:
Bass, D. Watford and M.F. Murphy
Plaintiff:
Takaeus Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Newman et al
as 1:2019cv00822
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Webb and Major Mike Webb
Defendant:
County of Arlington, Barbara Kanninen, Arlington Public School Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Webb v. Beyer et al
as 1:2019cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Webb and Major Mike Webb
Defendant:
Arlington County Fair, Alexandria Police Department, County of Arlington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. US of America Gov. et al
as 1:2019cv00462
Defendant:
US District Court of NJ Judges, Phil Murphy, US ATTY. General DOJ. and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ajani Obataiye v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00877
Defendant:
Rana A. Brace, Keith Dawkins, A.D. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Uhuru Sekou Oataiye-allah and Uhru'sekou Kamara Ajani Obataiye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
