Cases 61 - 70 of 770
Torres v. Wormuth
as 1:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kenneth Scott Torres
Defendant:
HON Christine E Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Bracy v. Briard
as 1:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Bracy
Defendant:
Major Scott Briard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Mortimer v. Hernandez-Mancia
as 4:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Mortimer
Defendant:
Jose Efrain Hernandez-Mancia
Interested Party:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Globus Medical Inc. v. Jamison et al
as 2:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Globus Medical Inc.
Defendant:
Shane Jamison, Mike Ruane, Mike Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aukhert et al v. Pritt Investment Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Natasha Aukhert and Jennifer Fairfax
Defendant:
Pritt Investment Partners, LLC and Scott H. Tripp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Midax, Inc. v. Allen
as 2:2022cv00224
Counter Defendant:
Midax, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Scott Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sourang v. Scott et al
as 1:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Mawloud Sourang
Respondent:
Charles Scott and G. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dye v. AECOM Federal/Technologies et al
as 1:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Scott Dye
Defendant:
AECOM Federal/Technologies, Department of General Services of Virginia, Virginia ABC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
