Cases 71 - 80 of 69,035
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David v. Virginia Employment Commissioner
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Jeanette D. David
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Explosive Countermeasures International, Inc. v. Rhodes
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Explosive Countermeasures International, Inc.
Defendant:
Rafael Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
10Pearls, LLC et al v. Boardroom One Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
10Pearls, LLC and 10Pearls Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Boardroom One Corporation, Brent Cohen, Kojo Annan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Kaleb v. Honor Beer Fairfax, LLC
as 1:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Louis Kaleb
Defendant:
Honor Beer Fairfax, LLC doing business as Honor Brewing Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
