Cases 1 - 10 of 340
Vick v. Temple et al
as 3:2024cv00662
Defendant:
Anthony Johnson, Sgt. Smith, Officer Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Dijon Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Walls et al
as 1:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Defendant:
Walls and P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Younce et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, J. F. Harman, R. Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dozier, Ashaun Ra and Ashann- Ra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Honey
as 3:2024cv00524
Defendant:
Judge John K. Honey
Plaintiff:
Steve Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. The United States Of America et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Defendant:
Director of CIA, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. Armed Forces and Military and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles, et al. v. Chapman, et al.
as 1:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Lindsay McCarty, Heather Sabbatino, Ronald Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Anderson
as 1:2024cv01225
Respondent:
David E. Anderson
Petitioner:
Ta'Kuan Keontay Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Defendant:
Renee Hayes, Elizabeth Lancaster, Lorraine Goldberg and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00987
Defendant:
Bob Anderson, Loudoun County, Anthony Needham and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Employee of Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Employee of Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
