Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Muhammad Abdullah v. Vergakis et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddin Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Col. J. Vergakis, Cpt. Robbins, Major Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
SHEPARD et al v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY-
as 1:2021cv01104
Plaintiff:
Melanie Shepard, Ciara Vargas, Tisha Valdez and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company doing business as Nestle Nutrition, doing business as Nestle Infant Nutrition doing business as Nestle Nutrition North America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Juliana Fondacaro, Mayra Verduzco, Andrea Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robbins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01024
Plaintiff:
Harvey L. Robbins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Chien v. Robbins et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Edward A. Robbins, Jr., Frederick G. Rockwell, III, Wendy Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Robbins v. Parole Board
as 3:2021cv00369
Petitioner:
Timothy M. Robbins
Respondent:
Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benson v. Governor Ralph Northam et al
as 1:2021cv00406
Defendant:
J Clifton, Harold W. Clark, Governor Ralph Northam and others
Plaintiff:
Robbine Lewis Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chien v. Robbins et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Defendant:
Frederick G. Rockwell, III, Karl S. Leonard, Wendy S. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Robbins v. Parole Board
as 3:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Parole Board
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snow v. Robbins
as 3:2020cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T. Snow, IV
Defendant:
Robert A. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
