Cases 101 - 110 of 1,009
Smith v. Randolph Restaurant Group, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Randolph Restaurant Group, Inc. doing business as Bojangles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Raposo v. Martin et al
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Michael Raposo
Defendant:
Tracy Martin, Kim White, Willie Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trail v. Cressell
as 7:2019cv00191
Plaintiff:
Linda Trail
Defendant:
David S. Cressell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raposo v. Clark
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Raposo
Defendant:
Fred Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suiter v. County of Augusta et al
as 5:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Antwhon Suiter
Defendant:
County of Augusta, Donald Smith, Deputy Obenschain., M.R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Doe et al
as 7:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, John Does 2-8, Howard B. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Hupman et al
as 6:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Marie Dudley and Patricia Marie Dudley
Defendant:
Dinah Hupman and McKenzie Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Porter v. Ohai
as 6:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gary Porter
Defendant:
Paul C. Ohai, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raposo v. City of Westminster Police Dept et al
as 4:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Raposo
Defendant:
City of Westminster Police Dept, City of Westminster, CO, Shawn Porta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Brittany Campbell, Kimilla Campbell and Isaiah Campbell
Defendant:
Melissa Smith, Danielle Nicholson, Brianna Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
