Cases 151 - 160 of 2,230
Scarborough v. Daniel et al
as 5:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Christie Scarborough
Defendant:
Mary Daniel, Nicholas Hager and Frederick County of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baird v. Ex Parte
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Baird
Defendant:
Ex Parte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Fifer et al v. Limon Properties, et al
as 7:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert Fifer and Teresa Fifer
Defendant:
Limon Properties - Fonseca Rentals, Limon Properties, Fonseca Rentals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Blevins v. Foster
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jerry Otha Blevins
Defendant:
Charles W. Foster, Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Reyes-Hernandez v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Defendant:
Ketterer, Browne & Associates, LLC, Monsanto Company, Bayer Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Elvira Reyes-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Winfree v. Gibson et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Winfree, III
Defendant:
Eric S. Gibson and E. S. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. White et al
as 5:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Price
Defendant:
Phillip White, Kyle Smith, Derinda Dameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
