Cases 1 - 10 of 235
Addair v. S.W.V.R.J.A. - Abingdon et al
as 7:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Addair
Defendant:
S.W.V.R.J.A. - Abingdon, Capt. Tatum, Lt. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00302
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Edwards v. Mathena et al
as 7:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Randall C. Mathena, Lois Fegan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Harris
as 7:2024cv00226
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
C.N. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloman v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Rick White, D. Turner, Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addair v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
as 7:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Addair
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moss v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Rockingham Regional Jail
as 7:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
