Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Sharp v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
William E. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fortune v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00481
Defendant:
B.L. Kanode, M. Elam, M. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Fortune, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Stevens et al
as 7:2018cv00362
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, John McGuire, B. L. Kanode and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yancey, Sr. v. Sanner et al
as 3:2012cv00016
Defendant:
Rhetta M. Daniel, Thomas Garrett, Jr., Ralph Main and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Yancey, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trantham v. Henry County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2010cv00058
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney (County of Henry), Drug Enforcement Agency, Gardner Gardner Barrow & Sharpe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Trantham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sharp v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00026
Defendant:
Mr. Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Mary Susan Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dicam, Inc. v. NEC Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dicam, Inc., Dicam, Inc. and Dicam, Inc.
Defendant:
NEC Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sharpe v. Phillips et al
as 3:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Sharpe, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas P. Phillips, Douglas P. Phillips, Xpresss Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
v. Shadwell et al
as 5:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Daniel Payne Shadwell
Defendant:
Timothy Kaine, Marilyn B. Tavenner, Robert McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
