Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Barbour v. Burgin et al
as 7:2010cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Barbour
Defendant:
Lt. Burgin, Former Sgt. Collins, C/O Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Egan v. Johnson
as 7:2010cv00336
Petitioner:
Edward James Egan
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
National Lawyers Guild, Inc. et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2010cv00040
Defendant:
Rita Bibbins, Larry Collins, Barbara Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Center for Constitutional Rights and National Lawyers Guild, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Johnson
as 7:2010cv00318
Defendant:
Director DOC Gene M. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Tyrell L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbour v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barbour
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, c/o McBribe and Bryan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Swalizoicy et al
as 7:2010cv00309
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Officer Eda, Officer Hensley, Gene M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Johnson
as 7:2010cv00301
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Petitioner:
Charlie Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbour v. Sanford et al
as 7:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Mr. Kensey, "Who They Where Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Johnson
as 7:2010cv00238
Petitioner:
Gregory J. Hale
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boger v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Boger
Defendant:
D.A. Braxton, Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
