Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Doe v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University et al
as 7:2018cv00320
Defendant:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Kyle Rose, Timothy Sands and others
Plaintiff:
James Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Hall v. Fleming et al
as 7:2012cv00406
Defendant:
Mr. Cox, Mr. L. J. Fleming, Mr. S. Fuller and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen v. Unknown
as 7:2012cv00328
Petitioner:
Terence Antoine Keen
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keen v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon Facility
as 7:2012cv00206
Defendant:
Dr. Abrokwah and Southwest Virginia Regional Jail-Abingdon Facility
Plaintiff:
Michael D Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onwuka v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center et al
as 7:2011cv00485
Defendant:
Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. C. Mathena and Unknown Dog Handlers
Plaintiff:
John Onwuka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Hopkins et al
as 7:2010cv00573
Defendant:
Dr. Hopkins and R. Keen
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center et al
as 7:2010cv00393
Defendant:
Mrs. Ball, M. Boyd, Lt. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Hawks et al
as 7:2010cv00329
Defendant:
A. Bucklen, C. Hawks, Sgt. Tammy Mitchem and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jason Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Defendant:
Acands Inc., Amchem Products Inc., Armstrong World Indu. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson B. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmidt v. Johnson et al
as 7:2008cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Schmidt
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Duncan Mills, A. J. Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
