Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Monroe v. Marshall et al
as 7:2011cv00122
Defendant:
Stephen U. Baer, Margret McLeod Cain, Hillary Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hairston v. Ziglar et al
as 7:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Calvin Coolidge Hairston, Jr.
Defendant:
Marshall Thomas and Joan Ziglar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. WDBJ Television, Inc.
as 7:2010cv00510
Plaintiff:
Marshall R. Sullivan
Defendant:
WDBJ Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kirby v. Henderson et al
as 7:2010cv00492
Defendant:
Capt. Agnew, C/O Carter, Maj. Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Trayon Kirby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2010cv00462
Defendant:
Cpl. Jack Hinton, Officer Chad Marshall, Middle River Regional Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Luis Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitebey v. Helton et al
as 7:2010cv00150
Defendant:
Joe Gaskins and U.S. Marshal Officer Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeannie M. Marshall
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marshall v. O'Brien
as 7:2009cv00424
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Marshall
Respondent:
Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marshall v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Marshall
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00042
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
