Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 7:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Charles O. Shephard
Respondent:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Lauren et al
as 7:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Ras Warren Edward Weaver
Defendant:
Head Nurse Lauren, Sargent Steven Smith, Corpral Zackory Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCracken v. Carter et al
as 7:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Bradley Eugene McCracken
Defendant:
Sgt. Carter, Officer Johnson, Lt. Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Bradley Ray Davis
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Robertson Construction, Inc. v. Bradley
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Craig Robertson Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew C. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bowers v. Hoag et al
as 7:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Bowers
Defendant:
Superintendant Hoag, MJR O'dell and Lisa Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Trinity Food Service Group
as 7:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jerry Orlando Bradley
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollack v. Jahshan
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Bradley Glenn Pollack
Defendant:
Reem Jahshan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Riddick v. Barton et al
as 7:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Lt. Douglas Barton, Unit Manager Larry Collins, C/O C. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
