Cases 1 - 10 of 635
Lassiter v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 7:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Lassiter
Defendant:
Greensville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruey v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
as 7:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
David Lee Cruey, II
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail - Tazewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldron v. Streeval et al
as 7:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Rondell Waldron
Defendant:
J.C. Streeval, USP Lee, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Felix v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Benjamin Arellano Felix
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Boyd
as 7:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gilford A. Lee
Defendant:
Randy Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. SWRJA, Abingdon, VA Medical et al
as 7:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Rocky Lee Woodard
Defendant:
SWRJA, Abingdon, VA Medical and SWVRJA, Abingdon, VA Chaplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockhern v. Warden of U.S.P. Lee
as 7:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Anthony Cockhern
Respondent:
Warden of U.S.P. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 7:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Charles O. Shephard
Respondent:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cecil v. Novak
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Jessee et al
as 7:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Leah Jessee, Kevin Fox, J. Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
