Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Rick White and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dolly Yvonne Parks
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Stephen M. Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Johnson et al
as 7:2018cv00519
Defendant:
Landon Kyle Johnson, Chadwick Wayne Custer and John/Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Derrike Ethan Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. Clarke et al
as 3:2012cv00036
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Phyllis A. Baskerville, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Bobinette D. Fearce, Patricia Knight, Marguerite Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haburn v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 7:2010cv00422
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Jarod Cearin, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Haburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Murphy v. Goff et al
as 6:2010cv00026
Defendant:
Carolyn Baker, Deborah Berkley, Bridges Treatment Center and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Murphy and Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Haburn v. Dean et al
as 7:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Aaron Haburn
Defendant:
M. C. Dean, John/Jane Doe, Mark E. Tozier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garland v. Ray et al
as 7:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Edmond Garland
Defendant:
Tracy S. Ray, T. Adams, Flemmings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
