Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Guynup v. Richardson et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Traci Guynup
Defendant:
Jean Richardson, Mr. Todd Sauers, Officer Terry Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. FCA US LLC
as 7:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Zachary James Neal
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Neal v. Neal
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jeffrey G. Neal
Defendant:
Cynthia A. Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Neal et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Neal and Abingdon Ear, Nose & Throat, P.C.
Defendant:
Michael C. Neal and Cynthia Ann Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Orlando v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Samuel Joseph Orlando
Defendant:
Sheriff Donald L. Smith, Major Brian Jenkins, Bristol Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00549
Petitioner:
Dai Shawn M. Neal
Respondent:
United States of America and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolden v. Youngkin et al
as 7:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Neal Bolden
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares, Todd Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00475
Petitioner:
Phillip Lenard Neal
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parks v. Lowe et al
as 7:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Charles Brandon Parks
Defendant:
Randall Lowe, Thomas L. Weaver, David R. Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Warden of USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00287
Petitioner:
Phillip Lenard Neal
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
